Laid Off Vs. Across the Line - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Laid Off Vs. Across the Line

The Golfing Machine - Basic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-07-2006, 11:09 PM
lagster lagster is offline
LBG Pro Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 848
Laid Off Vs. Across the Line
I saw some T.V. people today commenting on different players at the TOP or END. One mentioned that Bo Van Pelt was "laid off", but still got the club in a good place coming down. The other conversation had to do with V.J. Singh. They seemed to think that the reason he is struggeling now is because he has the club "laid off" at the TOP or End.

It seems like that the T.V. guys usually talk like the "laid off" position is a poor position. They rarely mention the "across the line" people as even having a problem.

Do you think there is some merit to what they are saying, or do they really not understand what an ON PLANE club and shaft should look like?

As I understand PLANE in this regard... the club should point either to the line the ball is on, or be parallel to that line.
If the club is not PARRALEL TO THE GROUND at the END, then it will appear to many to look "laid off". If the club goes BEYOND PARALLEL TO THE GROUND, it should be "across the line".

Now... according to this way of describing plane... Nick Price is "across the line" when his left arm is parallel to the ground on the BACKSWING. Raymond Floyd, at about the same place, is "laid off". At the Top or End... Jack Nicklaus, Bobby Jones, John Daly, Davis Love, Larry Nelson, and probably about at least 80% of tour players are "across the line". Ben Hogan(especially with his irons), and Peter Jacobsen, along with a few others appear "laid off" when they finish the backswing.



Discuss when these positions are OK, and when they are actually a problem. For example, I remember Mr. Yoda saying that Larry Nelson's "across the line" position at the finish of his backswing was actually OK for him, since he is a HITTER.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-08-2006, 07:57 AM
12 piece bucket's Avatar
12 piece bucket 12 piece bucket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
Originally Posted by lagster
I saw some T.V. people today commenting on different players at the TOP or END. One mentioned that Bo Van Pelt was "laid off", but still got the club in a good place coming down. The other conversation had to do with V.J. Singh. They seemed to think that the reason he is struggeling now is because he has the club "laid off" at the TOP or End.

It seems like that the T.V. guys usually talk like the "laid off" position is a poor position. They rarely mention the "across the line" people as even having a problem.

Do you think there is some merit to what they are saying, or do they really not understand what an ON PLANE club and shaft should look like?

As I understand PLANE in this regard... the club should point either to the line the ball is on, or be parallel to that line.
If the club is not PARRALEL TO THE GROUND at the END, then it will appear to many to look "laid off". If the club goes BEYOND PARALLEL TO THE GROUND, it should be "across the line".

Now... according to this way of describing plane... Nick Price is "across the line" when his left arm is parallel to the ground on the BACKSWING. Raymond Floyd, at about the same place, is "laid off". At the Top or End... Jack Nicklaus, Bobby Jones, John Daly, Davis Love, Larry Nelson, and probably about at least 80% of tour players are "across the line". Ben Hogan(especially with his irons), and Peter Jacobsen, along with a few others appear "laid off" when they finish the backswing.



Discuss when these positions are OK, and when they are actually a problem. For example, I remember Mr. Yoda saying that Larry Nelson's "across the line" position at the finish of his backswing was actually OK for him, since he is a HITTER.
Annikan Grandmaster of Chapter 10 Skywalker had a great post on this a while back. He gave several great reasons as to WHY one would be "across the line." I think the 4 main culprits are 1. a Start-Up that doesn't have enough UP e.g. under plane 2. a Right Forearm that is ROLLED at Top and not TURNED to the Plane 3. Too deep shoulder turn 4. A COCKED Right Wrist.

Not Yoda, but I think the reason L. Nelson is "across-the-line" is because he is a hitter employing the surrogate 10-5-E Plane Line (Cross-Line Angle of Approach).

And another thing . . . a person that has an End at Top, the club SHOULD have a laid-off look if it is pointing at the geometric Plane Line.
__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand

Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-08-2006, 09:40 AM
birdie_man's Avatar
birdie_man birdie_man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canader
Posts: 1,092
Originally Posted by lagster
As I understand PLANE in this regard... the club should point either to the line the ball is on, or be parallel to that line.
If the club is not PARRALEL TO THE GROUND at the END, then it will appear to many to look "laid off". If the club goes BEYOND PARALLEL TO THE GROUND, it should be "across the line".
My thoughts:

"Laid off"

-over-Turn of the clubface in backswing....underplane
-backswing has not gone to parallel (as you said above)
-Arched left wrist (??)
-camera aimed too much at the belly

...

"Across the line"

-backswing goes beyond parallel
-Double-Cocked...flying right elbow
-camera aimed too much at the player's back
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-31-2006, 11:30 PM
strav strav is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 233
Laid off
Originally Posted by birdie_man
My thoughts:

"Laid off"

-over-Turn of the clubface in backswing....underplane
-backswing has not gone to parallel (as you said above)
-Arched left wrist (??)
-camera aimed too much at the belly

...
[IMG][/IMG]

Hank Haney's definition is:
"Your club is laid off when it is behind your hands at any point in the swing"


From the photos you can see what he means but what would be a better description?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-01-2006, 12:11 AM
jim_0068 jim_0068 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: the cold midwest
Posts: 675
Originally Posted by strav
[IMG][/IMG]

Hank Haney's definition is:
"Your club is laid off when it is behind your hands at any point in the swing"


From the photos you can see what he means but what would be a better description?
there is ABSOLUTELY NO FREAKN' WAY you can go from the position 2nd to last to the last.
__________________
I'm not a TGM or PGA certified Pro, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-01-2006, 12:58 AM
strav strav is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 233
Demo
Originally Posted by jim_0068
there is ABSOLUTELY NO FREAKN' WAY you can go from the position 2nd to last to the last.
Don't think this is meant to be a sequence - rather posed positions for demonstration purposes only showing how the club can be laid off at various stages in different swings. He makes the point that no matter where the club is 'laid off' the shot pattern will be the same i.e. blocked to the right unless he flips his hands through impact and if he uses his hands too much he might hit a duck hook. Either way - no consistency.
Would you agree?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-01-2006, 09:54 AM
EdZ EdZ is offline
Lynn Blake Certified Instructor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Linn, OR
Posts: 1,645


As a an aside, the second picture is a VERY common move and one of the single biggest reasons that people can't square up the face - a bad takeaway that is both too inside and, ironically, overplane, or 'laid off'

Keeping the clubhead 'outside' the hands until hip high is the key to fixing this.
__________________
"Support the On Plane Swinging Force in Balance"

"we have no friends, we have no enemies, we have only teachers"

Simplicity buffs, see 5-0, 1-L, 2-0 A and B 10-2-B, 4-D, 6B-1D, 6-B-3-0-1, 6-C-1, 6-E-2
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-01-2006, 04:08 PM
birdie_man's Avatar
birdie_man birdie_man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canader
Posts: 1,092
Originally Posted by strav
Don't think this is meant to be a sequence - rather posed positions for demonstration purposes only showing how the club can be laid off at various stages in different swings.
Why would he start at that address position tho?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Line of Compression . . . 12 piece bucket The Golfing Machine - Advanced 7 10-16-2006 10:54 AM
How far is the Low Point Plane Line from the Impact Plane Line? 12 piece bucket The Golfing Machine - Basic 16 09-26-2006 07:43 AM
Roll on the line stilltrying The Golfing Machine - Basic 7 02-01-2006 02:54 PM
Target Line - Plane Line - Line of Flight Martee The Lab 8 01-30-2006 12:42 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.