What % Science and What % Art
Mind over Muscle – The Mental Approach
|

05-26-2005, 10:13 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
|
|
|
What % Science and What % Art
Hey guys,
We talk a lot of Machine science out here. But how much of golf would you estimate to be Science and how much Art? Or how much of the science do you have to have before you feel like I can stop "fixing" my swing?
I have been spending a lot of time at the putting green lately hitting little pitches and chips. To me this is where the Machine can truly paint pictures with all the different Hinging and Stance/Plane Line combos.
__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand
Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
|
|

05-26-2005, 10:25 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 10,681
|
|
|
We Has Seen The Enemy
|
Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket
|
Hey guys,
We talk a lot of Machine science out here. But how much of golf would you estimate to be Science and how much Art? Or how much of the science do you have to have before you feel like I can stop "fixing" my swing?
|
The Science is there.
The Alignments are there.
The Human Element makes it an art.
__________________
Yoda
|
|

05-26-2005, 10:47 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern New Jersey
Posts: 1,605
|
|
|
Re: We Has Seen The Enemy
|
Originally Posted by Yoda
|
The Science is there.
The Alignments are there.
The Human Element makes it an art.
|
=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
|
|

05-26-2005, 11:16 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oceanside CA
Posts: 1,398
|
|
|
Art
I wouldn't think it would be a percentage. Art is the result of having the ability - whether subconscious or conscious - to apply scientific principles in action. The better one's understanding of science (subconsciously or consciously), the better and more varied the application can be.
|
|

05-26-2005, 11:26 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
|
|
|
Re: Art
|
Originally Posted by Mike O
|
|
I wouldn't think it would be a percentage. Art is the result of having the ability - whether subconscious or conscious - to apply scientific principles in action. The better one's understanding of science (subconsciously or consciously), the better and more varied the application can be.
|
Mike,
Thanks for the response. Have you seen people break through plateaus via Golfing Machine and take a certain degree of "ownership" of the science? Or the question could be what is the path from "understanding" to execution or "doing?"
Thanks!
B
__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand
Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
|
|

05-26-2005, 11:36 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oceanside CA
Posts: 1,398
|
|
|
The Path
I think the quick and simple answer for the PATH in this regard would be YODA!
At the same time- as Homer says in 2-0 "Principles are simple- their applications get complicated." It's never necessarily easy reaching new plateaus!
|
|

05-27-2005, 12:59 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 212
|
|
|
ANOTHER MANZELLA ANALOGY.....
Paint is the science....painting is the art.
The Teacher's knowledge is the science...the WAY he uses it is the art.
The golfer's technique is the science...the shots—in competition—is the art.
....
How would you know whether or not a golfer who be better off as a swinger, with a certain pattern, then a hitter with another?
Art.
How would you know the patterns in the first place?
Science.
....
Like Homer said...the EASY part is the SCIENCE, the hard part is the APPLICATION.
|
|

05-27-2005, 02:29 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
|
|
|
Originally Posted by brianmanzella
|
ANOTHER MANZELLA ANALOGY.....
Paint is the science....painting is the art.
The Teacher's knowledge is the science...the WAY he uses it is the art.
The golfer's technique is the science...the shots—in competition—is the art.
....
How would you know whether or not a golfer who be better off as a swinger, with a certain pattern, then a hitter with another?
Art.
How would you know the patterns in the first place?
Science.
....
Like Homer said...the EASY part is the SCIENCE, the hard part is the APPLICATION.
|
B,
If a dude came to you and said "Look I want you to put me on a practice schedule to reduce my handicap by 30% or better. I'm willing to devote 2-3 hours of range/short game work and 2 hours of drills indoors per week for 6 months." What would you do assuming the guy had decent alignments and concepts?
Thanks!
Bucket
__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand
Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
|
|

05-27-2005, 03:34 PM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 212
|
|
|
Without changing ANYthing mechanically?
|
|

05-27-2005, 09:52 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
|
|
|
Originally Posted by brianmanzella
|
|
Without changing ANYthing mechanically?
|
No. If there were mechanical flaws change it, but the ultimate goal would be lower numbers. Of course if this could be achieved by changing mechanics cool. But with the objective being lower numbers, not a perfect swing but a functional swing.
__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand
Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| Science Golf? |
KOC |
The Clubhouse Lounge |
9 |
12-05-2006 02:19 PM |
| Science and G.O.L.F |
comdpa |
The Lab |
19 |
10-23-2006 09:12 AM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 PM.
|
| |