LynnBlakeGolf Forums - View Single Post - End vs Top for Swingers Thread: End vs Top for Swingers View Single Post #7 12-11-2005, 10:21 PM comdpa Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Singapore Posts: 627 Originally Posted by mattsdad Thanks to all for the replies. To comdpa: I agree that less may be better, which is why I wondered why Homer recommended End as the Assembly Point. You can find the answer to your question in 6-C-2-D and in 6-B-1-D, if you apply Extensor Action, its tough to get past the Top position. I will admit, there are stuff in the book that I don't yet fully comprehend. But we need to let those things that are easily understood take precedence over the obscure. Besides the point you raised, there are some other issues that are obscure too: In 7-9, 10-9-B, Impact address is mentioned as "useful" for hitters, yet in 12-1-0, why is standard address listed? In 12-2-0, why is it a snap load then a non-auto sweep release? Should they not be the same as in snap with snap or sweep with sweep? Homer is not around that we can ask him, but like I mentioned above, let the clear and obvious preside over the obscure. And besides, this forum seems to be doing pretty ok...haha Last edited by comdpa : 12-11-2005 at 10:32 PM. comdpa View Public Profile Send a private message to comdpa Find all posts by comdpa