![]() |
Jack's thoughts
Quote:
For example, if I can’t get the correct hip turn going back by thinking “turn the Left hip”, I’ll think “pull the right hip out of the way”. The same sort of thing often applies with the shoulders on the forward swing. My preferred thought is “move the left shoulder up and the left hip around.” But if that doesn’t seem to be working, I’ll try "move the right shoulder down and the right hip around.” So long as the desired effect is achieved, I don’t think it matters at all which side you think about. In fact, it’s probably good to switch patterns occasionally, for the sake of striking a balance. Thinking one side or the other all the time can easily lead to exaggeration of a particular move. Jack Nicklaus 1974 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That is a sure fire recipe for round housing. The left shoulder should not take any active part in the downswing and must only be left to respond to the dictates of its right sided cousin. If "righty" goes down and out then "lefty" has no where else to go other than up and in. Not so the other way round though!:naughty: |
I think it works.
Esp. considering you pull from the left side. |
Quote:
I can see where you are coming from but considering that the left shoulder/arm, et al, are never on plane, but the right forearm, at impact, and the right shoulder, coming down plane into impact, must be, then the focus should be on them and not on an inactive, off plane, left shoulder. Any downswing precipitated, and governed, by the left shoulder has to have an unacceptable potential for undesirable consequences. |
I know what you're saying....in that the right shoulder is what you should be monitoring alignment wise.....but I think there something not right about actually actively moving it downplane in the downswing.....that's just me though I guess.
I understand there are some people who like to do this....I think Jim has said it works for him. Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 AM. |