Prestressed Shaft and Impact Deceleration - Page 2 - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Prestressed Shaft and Impact Deceleration

The Golfing Machine - Basic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-11-2006, 12:47 PM
Yoda's Avatar
Yoda Yoda is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 10,681
Toe Talk
Originally Posted by armourall

Love it when you post these little gems, but why the "toe" of the Club, and not the Sweet Spot?
I used the phrase "Toe of the Club" because that is exactly the phrase Homer Kelley used. I wondered the same thing as I wrote the post and here would be my answer (not his):

Remember, during Release, both the Clubshaft and the Toe of the Club are rotating around the Sweetspot. And the Toe of the Swinger's Club is rotating counter-clockwise trying desperately to get 'in line' with the Sweet Spot and #3 Pressure Point for Horizontal Hinging through Impact. Hence, Homer's reference to the Toe causing the Release Bend.

Interesting sidelight:

That's why those old-timey wooden golf clubs were made with such long Toes. They were virtually impossible to Angled Hinge!
__________________
Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-11-2006, 11:53 AM
Mike O's Avatar
Mike O Mike O is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oceanside CA
Posts: 1,398
Wallop of Centrifugal Force
Originally Posted by Yoda
In a 1981 GSEM Class discussion, Homer Kelley referred to two types of Clubshaft Bend for Swingers. The first -- "Acceleration Bend" -- stresses the top of the Shaft during the Start Down. During the second -- "Release Bend" -- the stress is opposite the Acceleration Bend as the toe of the Club attempts to get in line with the #3 Pressure Point.

The Hitter's stress is at the back of the Shaft and does not vary.
Thanks Lynn! Great addition to this thread!

Just for my curiosity can you or someone else reference where he says the "wallop of centrifugal force" in the book- I believe it's there but am blanking out where to look.

Actually, never mind- I found it in 6-F-1 "Right" Timing...."Acceleration ceases when the speed it has produced equals that of the Thrust, and though the thrust is still present and able to maintain Velocity, it loses the flexed, stressed Clubshaft (Hitters) and the wallop of the Centrifugal Force (Swingers)."

Last edited by Mike O : 05-11-2006 at 11:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-11-2006, 11:37 PM
12 piece bucket's Avatar
12 piece bucket 12 piece bucket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
Oooooo!!!! Ooooooooo!!!!! I know!!!!! I know!!!!!
Originally Posted by Mike O
Thanks Lynn! Great addition to this thread!

Just for my curiosity can you or someone else reference where he says the "wallop of centrifugal force" in the book- I believe it's there but am blanking out where to look.

Actually, never mind- I found it in 6-F-1 "Right" Timing...."Acceleration ceases when the speed it has produced equals that of the Thrust, and though the thrust is still present and able to maintain Velocity, it loses the flexed, stressed Clubshaft (Hitters) and the wallop of the Centrifugal Force (Swingers)."
Mike-O-the-Psycho,
6-F-1 “RIGHT” TIMING Maximum Force is delivered by maximum Thrust (muscular and/or centrifugal) near – but prior to – full extension.

Acceleration ceases when the speed it has produced equals that of the Thrust, and though the Thrust is still present and able to maintain Velocity, it loses the flexed, stressed Clubshaft (Hitters) and the wallop of the Centrifugal Force (Swingers).
How's the rash by the way?

Bucket
__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand

Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2006, 09:26 PM
jmessner jmessner is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 23
Originally Posted by Yoda
In a 1981 GSEM Class discussion, Homer Kelley referred to two types of Clubshaft Bend for Swingers. The first -- "Acceleration Bend" -- stresses the top of the Shaft during the Start Down. During the second -- "Release Bend" -- the stress is opposite the Acceleration Bend as the toe of the Club attempts to get in line with the #3 Pressure Point.

The Hitter's stress is at the back of the Shaft and does not vary.
It's interesting that he mentioned both of these bending features because some of the guys doing advanced shaft fitting take into account the bending characteristics at different points (zones) in the shaft. Specifically, the swing tempo may be considered for "Acceleration Bend" (using your terminology) and release quality for "Release Bend".

As I mentioned earlier the "Release Bend" is generally toward the target for almost all golfers (for full swings) and is caused by the centrifugal force due to the clubhead speed pulling outward on the shaft through it's center of gravity - thus, CoG wants to line up with the shaft axis bending the shaft forward. That's why offset heads tend to hit the ball higher and could slightly correct a fade because the CofG is further behind the shaft and the shaft will tend to bend more forward with these heads. Ok - maybe too much information there.

Still a little dubious on the impact deceleration concept - but it may be a "real vs feel" thing in that it helps to think about accelerating through impact to avoid quitting, throwaway, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-11-2006, 10:14 PM
Yoda's Avatar
Yoda Yoda is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 10,681
Getting 'Smarter'...Day By Day
Originally Posted by jmessner

It's interesting that he mentioned both of these bending features because some of the guys doing advanced shaft fitting take into account the bending characteristics at different points (zones) in the shaft. Specifically, the swing tempo may be considered for "Acceleration Bend" (using your terminology) and release quality for "Release Bend".

As I mentioned earlier the "Release Bend" is generally toward the target for almost all golfers (for full swings) and is caused by the centrifugal force due to the clubhead speed pulling outward on the shaft through it's center of gravity - thus, CoG wants to line up with the shaft axis bending the shaft forward.
"'Release Bend' is generally toward the target for almost all golfers."

Thanks, jmessner. Your insights help us all!
__________________
Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-11-2006, 10:52 PM
lagster lagster is offline
LBG Pro Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 848
Pictures
Originally Posted by jmessner
It's interesting that he mentioned both of these bending features because some of the guys doing advanced shaft fitting take into account the bending characteristics at different points (zones) in the shaft. Specifically, the swing tempo may be considered for "Acceleration Bend" (using your terminology) and release quality for "Release Bend".

As I mentioned earlier the "Release Bend" is generally toward the target for almost all golfers (for full swings) and is caused by the centrifugal force due to the clubhead speed pulling outward on the shaft through it's center of gravity - thus, CoG wants to line up with the shaft axis bending the shaft forward. That's why offset heads tend to hit the ball higher and could slightly correct a fade because the CofG is further behind the shaft and the shaft will tend to bend more forward with these heads. Ok - maybe too much information there.

Still a little dubious on the impact deceleration concept - but it may be a "real vs feel" thing in that it helps to think about accelerating through impact to avoid quitting, throwaway, etc.
/////////////////////////////////////////////

Some pictures showing these bends would be nice... or are they too subtle to see?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-12-2006, 11:27 PM
Daryl's Avatar
Daryl Daryl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,521
Originally Posted by Yoda
In a 1981 GSEM Class discussion, Homer Kelley referred to two types of Clubshaft Bend for Swingers. The first -- "Acceleration Bend" -- stresses the top of the Shaft during the Start Down. During the second -- "Release Bend" -- the stress is opposite the Acceleration Bend as the toe of the Club attempts to get in line with the #3 Pressure Point.

The Hitter's stress is at the back of the Shaft and does not vary.
I guess then, that the 7Th edition may explain this. Then the existing 6-C-2-A section is no longer completely applicable to a swinger.

I'll buy new clubs with extra flexible shafts to get that added "Kick" the shaft will supply as I stop moving my hands to allow the shaft to take over through impact. Hmm? Or I can change to a Hitting stroke pattern.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-12-2006, 11:55 PM
jmessner jmessner is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 23
Originally Posted by Daryl
I guess then, that the 7Th edition may explain this. Then the existing 6-C-2-A section is no longer completely applicable to a swinger.

I'll buy new clubs with extra flexible shafts to get that added "Kick" the shaft will supply as I stop moving my hands to allow the shaft to take over through impact. Hmm? Or I can change to a Hitting stroke pattern.
I would have thought so too, and if only a good shaft fitting were that simple, but I probably should have added:

Wishon, "The Search for the Perfect Golf Club", 2005
Chapter 4 Myths-
Myth #3 - "The third myth to bury is that the forward flexing of the shaft just before impact (which some people mistakenly call "buggy-whipping" or "kicking") increases the speed of the clubhead"......

I started this thread by saying I'm much more up on clubfitting than TGM (trying to change that) and that is probably evident in my posts, but I think there's opportunity for incorporating concepts from both to increase one's ability to teach and/or learn to play this game.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-10-2006, 11:51 AM
ThinkingPlus's Avatar
ThinkingPlus ThinkingPlus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Palmdale, CA
Posts: 234
Speed of Sound, Springs, and Things
Originally Posted by jmessner
What does HK mean in 2-E and 2-M-1 regarding a "prestressed" shaft? He seems to imply it's bent but I'm not sure in which direction. Also, the way I read it he is saying this condition will reduce Impact Deceleration(?).

The reason I ask is I've been into clubmaking a lot longer than TGM and on the face seems to conflict with my understanding of the physics of impact. For example, Cochran & Stobbs in "The Search for the Perfect Swing" showed that there was basically no influence by the player or shaft during impact and that the exiting ball speed is determined solely by the clubhead speed just prior to impact (assuming square contact etc.). This doesn't jive with the idea of "resisting impact deceleration" so I'm missing something.

Maybe I'm reading it too literally - he could be just trying to emphasize not quitting and reducing throwaway and such but he uses rather specific scientific terminology so I'm not so sure.
I have never read SftPS and don't know how C&S did their analysis. Basically, as far as I can tell, hitting the ball with a pre-stressed shaft should allow more momentum transfer to occur during impact. The shaft is just a spring. When a spring is compressed as far as it will go, it becomes effectively stiffer (up to the yield point of the material in question).

In addition, how a players hands brace the club at impact may provide a stiffer interface as well. That is one of the important aspects of the bent right and flat left wrists at and through impact.

Now for the kicker. All of this may not matter, from a momentum transfer point of view, if the speed of sound in the shaft is small enough such that the vibration or feel of impact occurs after the ball has left the face. At least in the case of steel rods (not exactly a shaft, but maybe a good approximation???), the speed of sound would allow the feel of impact to reach the hands roughly halfway through impact. As you can see, it is a very complicated interaction and highly dependent on shaft material properties, ball material properties, and clubhead speed at impact.

FWIW, regardless of how this impact momentum transfer stuff works out, in the book "The Physics of Golf" by Theodore Jorgensen, his model (matched against the swing of a tour player) showed that the most efficient transfer of clubhead speed to ball speed occurred when the club was at a 15* angle (ahead) relative to the ball at impact. That is essentially what one gets with a bent right wrist and flat left (more or less).
__________________
_________________________________
Steph
Distance is Magic; Precision is Practice.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shaft Lean at Impact smooth The Golfing Machine - Basic 10 08-22-2006 09:28 PM
Shaft location? curtisj76 The Other Game - Putting 19 02-08-2006 09:27 AM
Bottom of shaft inside ball at impact Tonio The Clubhouse Lounge 6 04-09-2005 03:27 PM
Shaft Flex lagster Drills, Training Aids and Equipment 3 03-02-2005 11:53 PM
Shaft Plane LSH The Golfing Machine - Basic 10 01-27-2005 10:09 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:51 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.