To All,
Since Peter Croker posts on this site, I felt it would be ok to add these comments here. There also is another thread here discussing the TGM definitions by Paul Hart, GSED on Peter's site.
I just finished watching the TGM CGS analysis by Paul Hart, GSED from Australia and Peter Croker. I must say that it is a MUST SEE by all those who have had exposure to CGS, who are on the “Path to Better Golf” using the CGS or just looking for a fresh approach. In my humble opinion, it may be Peter’s best conceptual work to date.
Peter and Paul have done an excellent job explaining the CGS using the TGM 24 components and then some. There is a lot of additional information by Peter to explain what he is thinking and feeling. Insights that are very valuable with details clearly understood.
Paul’s final analysis on CGS stroke pattern will surprise some. The reasons why are insightful. If I say any more, I’ll give away the ending.
Thanks to both Peter and Paul for taking the time to make this analysis possible.
Cheers,
Lee Deitrick
PS: Lynn, thanks for having an open forum where we can post this for those interested in TGM.
The analysis can be found at http://www.crokergolf.com/swing_analysis.htm. It costs $3.00 but worth every penny.
Couldn't agree with you more on the quality and findings of Paul's analysis...and more importantly on Yoda allowing a forum that is open to all that is TGM and those that may have diverse opinions provided that it is presented in a dignified manner.
I am quite sure that Homer would enjoy seeing the directions that TGM has taken and would also be open-minded to at least evaluate and analyze the varying approaches to his teachings that others have undertaken...whether one considers it TGM "pure" or not should not close one's mind to it's merits or possibilities...if only to substantiate one's own belief and understanding. Homer's work was not completed after his first edition...it was an ever evolving learning process.
Hybrid Mode
