10-19-0 5th edition dicussion of Loading with Angle vs. Arc - Page 2 - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

10-19-0 5th edition dicussion of Loading with Angle vs. Arc

The Golfing Machine - Advanced

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-23-2006, 09:46 AM
annikan skywalker's Avatar
annikan skywalker annikan skywalker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 796
Yeah...and this wreaks of MORAD ...The Arc of Approach procedure would be CP and the True Geometric Plane Line would be CF...All the parts come together and the timing is just right.....1980???? 5th edition ...Mac working with Homer 1979-?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-23-2006, 11:48 AM
EdZ EdZ is offline
Lynn Blake Certified Instructor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Linn, OR
Posts: 1,645
Originally Posted by annikan skywalker
To whom it may concern,
Why did Mr. Kelley omit this from the 6th edition?
5th editiion
Drive Loading calls for the Angle of Approach procedure(2-J-3) which REQUIRES:
-1. Pre-turned Hips at the Takeaway
-2. a"sliding" DOWNSTROKE body motion
-3. A LINE delivery path
-4. The right forearm tracing the Angle of Approach (Crooss-Line motion 7-23)

Drag Loading calls for the Arc of Approach procedure (2-J-3-A) which requires:
-5. Delayed Hip Action
-6. a "rotating" DOWNSTROKE body motion
-7. A Circle Delivery Path
-8. The right forearm tracing the Arc of Approach (On-line motion 7-23)

I think this very valuable info.... What do ya think? Why was it taken out of the 6th edition....Anybody got an idea?

Bottled Coke and Peanuts,
Annikan
The short answer is that to leave this in, certainly as written, would suggest that hinge action was tied directly to hit vs swing, that it defined them. You can still swing with angled hinge, or hit with horizontal, so these statements are too limiting. That said, they are reasonable suggestions that explain pretty clearly 'compatible' components.
__________________
"Support the On Plane Swinging Force in Balance"

"we have no friends, we have no enemies, we have only teachers"

Simplicity buffs, see 5-0, 1-L, 2-0 A and B 10-2-B, 4-D, 6B-1D, 6-B-3-0-1, 6-C-1, 6-E-2
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-23-2006, 12:09 PM
Mike O's Avatar
Mike O Mike O is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oceanside CA
Posts: 1,398
Clean up
Originally Posted by tongzilla
Homer meant Tracing the Arc of Approach with the Right Forearm, not the Clubhead. Since the Arc of Approach is a Delivery Line that guides the Clubhead, the Clubhead covers the curved Arc of Approach. This contrasts with the True Geometric Plane Line because both the Right Forearm (and the Clubhshaft/Sweetspot) and the Clubhead Trace that Delivery Line.
Tong,
As Annikan posted- the above is unclear - can you clean it up?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-23-2006, 01:02 PM
yippedagain yippedagain is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 26
Reeks or wreaks ?.

Yes, the timing is bang on.

Were there problems when he removed it?. I am sure someone must know what was going on then. I have heard lots but only second hand, so am not qualified to comment.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-25-2006, 03:25 PM
tobell tobell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 32
Compatible Components
Originally Posted by EdZ
The short answer is that to leave this in, certainly as written, would suggest that hinge action was tied directly to hit vs swing, that it defined them. You can still swing with angled hinge, or hit with horizontal, so these statements are too limiting. That said, they are reasonable suggestions that explain pretty clearly 'compatible' components.


"Compatible Components", ultimately that's what it's all about; and the 10-19-0 in the 5th edition really shines some light--thanks Annikan. I hold optimizing component compatibility as the ultimate skill. The three imperatives plus the three essentials with the set of compatible components that best suite the individual player. Now we're talkin golf.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-07-2006, 10:52 PM
lagster lagster is offline
LBG Pro Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 848
Circle /Drag
Originally Posted by annikan skywalker
To whom it may concern,
Why did Mr. Kelley omit this from the 6th edition?
5th editiion
Drive Loading calls for the Angle of Approach procedure(2-J-3) which REQUIRES:
-1. Pre-turned Hips at the Takeaway
-2. a"sliding" DOWNSTROKE body motion
-3. A LINE delivery path
-4. The right forearm tracing the Angle of Approach (Crooss-Line motion 7-23)

Drag Loading calls for the Arc of Approach procedure (2-J-3-A) which requires:
-5. Delayed Hip Action
-6. a "rotating" DOWNSTROKE body motion
-7. A Circle Delivery Path
-8. The right forearm tracing the Arc of Approach (On-line motion 7-23)

I think this very valuable info.... What do ya think? Why was it taken out of the 6th edition....Anybody got an idea?

Bottled Coke and Peanuts,
Annikan
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Discuss the Relationship between Drag Loading("striving to accelerate the clubshaft lengthwise") and Circle Delivery Path of the HANDS.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-08-2006, 10:23 AM
EdZ EdZ is offline
Lynn Blake Certified Instructor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Linn, OR
Posts: 1,645
Originally Posted by lagster
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Discuss the Relationship between Drag Loading("striving to accelerate the clubshaft lengthwise") and Circle Delivery Path of the HANDS.
To accelerate the clubshaft lengthwise, force must move 'away from center', circle delivery being the more 'pure' form of that motion.
__________________
"Support the On Plane Swinging Force in Balance"

"we have no friends, we have no enemies, we have only teachers"

Simplicity buffs, see 5-0, 1-L, 2-0 A and B 10-2-B, 4-D, 6B-1D, 6-B-3-0-1, 6-C-1, 6-E-2
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-10-2006, 10:28 AM
lagster lagster is offline
LBG Pro Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 848
5 th Edition and 10-23-C
What did 10-23-C say in the 5th Edition?

I would like to see some discussion on these HAND PATHS... their relationship to HITTING and SWINGING, AXIS TILTS, CROSS LINE, ON LINE, TRUE GEOMETRIC PLANE LINE, etc..
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-11-2006, 04:07 PM
lagster lagster is offline
LBG Pro Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 848
Hand Paths
Originally Posted by lagster
What did 10-23-C say in the 5th Edition?

I would like to see some discussion on these HAND PATHS... their relationship to HITTING and SWINGING, AXIS TILTS, CROSS LINE, ON LINE, TRUE GEOMETRIC PLANE LINE, etc..
///////////////////////////////////////

No takers on this one? The Angled Line Delivery Path, for example, according to the book, is used when shifting to the Elbow Plane on the Downstroke. There are many good players that do this. Some stay on the Turned Shoulder.

Let's discuss Hand Paths relating to this.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Please Compare and Contrast the Arc of Approach and Angle of Approach . . 12 piece bucket The Golfing Machine - Advanced 11 07-03-2007 03:50 AM
7-19 LAG LOADING from the 3rd Edition 12 piece bucket The Golfing Machine - Basic 7 12-01-2006 12:09 AM
5th edition 10-19-0 annikan skywalker The Golfing Machine - Basic 11 10-05-2005 12:20 PM
PLANE ANGLE/ SPINE ANGLE? lagster The Golfing Machine - Advanced 1 06-11-2005 10:41 AM
VJ-The Putting Arc mgjordan The Other Game - Putting 19 04-06-2005 11:09 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.