Mr. Jack Kuykendall stated in his web site that the majority of the book is INCORRECT. Mr. Homer Kelley's was wrong for science term and use of english such as CENTRIFUGAL FORCE...
He said his system is the Greatest Physics Discovery in the History of Golf, very interested and powerful indeed...
My mentor visited Mr. Jack KUYKENDALL on Nov 2006 and recorded some videos that is really interesting to me.
However, Mr. Jack Kuykendall stated in his web site that Mr. Homer Kelley's was wrong for science term and use of english!
For example, he questioned about the right arm flying wedge - the clubhead may appeared to move in an arc around and outside the hands when related to left arm...
Part 1 -
Part 2 -
Basically, i think he is a hitter. I will try to upload his swing later on.
He needs to be on this forum . . . we could show him or describe to him how the club APPEARS to move around the hands . . . VIA THE ROLL OF THE #3 ACCUMULATOR. 2-K is where he needs to read.
He needs to be on this forum . . . we could show him or describe to him how the club APPEARS to move around the hands . . . VIA THE ROLL OF THE #3 ACCUMULATOR.
To begin with we could show him that if you read a paragraph - you should at least know where that paragraph comes from....
The flying wedges 6-B-3-1 being in the accumulator no.3 section 6-B-3-0 ...
Trust me, Jack know the book, as he keeps it with him all the time.
Jack is a very interesting guy, and he is nice too. He is very good in Kinesiology , Neuroscience, Anatonmy. Although Jack is teaching just one method, but his method is very sound.
I am quite sure he knows 6-B-3-0 as he is doing it all the time.
I think is perfectly OK, if someone is teaching Hands controlled Pivot, where right arm is driving and left arm is swinging.. or Right arm is driving the left arm (Lever) Using the right forearm thrust and the Accumulator #3.... Perfect. At his age (not 25years old) he still drive about 260-270 (range ball) carries, and 9 iron 150+.... so I presume his geometry can't be that bad.
The only thing I can say about Jack is, he thinks like Homer.... instead of having a full system, he figured out his method.
In order to show my respect to the man, I had removed the videos, as I do not have the premission from him to post it on public forum. By letting me to take the video is a matter of "trust". I won't mind to share the footage within a small group, but definately not publishing it without premission from Jack.
__________________
I am not East Coast nor West Coast... I stick to the MIDLAND
The purpose of this thread is to have other way to look at the golf swing. Hope anyone don't mind including Jack. And i am strongly believe his wordings!
Kuykendall's Theories Challenge claim:
"If any of my theories can be disproved, I will give credit to the person who made the discovery and modify or abandon that theory!"
Trig and I have met him and heard his rants against Homer first hand. I took some video of his swing which I won't post.
However, if someone has a bad back or some other serious physical problem that would prevent them from executing an orthodox swing or hit, then he may have a method that would help. You may want to inquire along those lines.
__________________
Bagger
1-H "Because of questions of all kinds, reams of additional detail must be made available - but separately, and probably endlessly." Homer Kelly
I saw the videos and in my opinion Jack Kuykendall did not come over well. This statement switches me right off
The Greatest Physics Discovery in the History of Golf!
In July of 1997, I made the greatest physics discovery in the history of golf. I discovered a new lever system that allows golfers to hit balls farther and straighter with the virtual elimination of strain on the back and shoulders. In less than 90-days, any golfer can began to change memory patterns to a repeatable mechanical motion that will allow for consistent and accurate golf shots for the rest of his/her life. My new training device (patent pending) forces the correct motion to be made.
I think there is a case for looking at his stroke patern and breaking it down into it's various components. I think you will find that that it is no discovery but the method he is selling.
I think there is a case for looking at his stroke patern and breaking it down into it's various components. I think you will find that that it is no discovery but the method he is selling.
I think that would require based on my limited understanding of his method, a number of 'X' classifications of components. Also I am not sure his description/concepts tracks with the concepts of TGM.
The question is at what point do too many 'X' classifications and the advocation of different concepts take it out of what could be accurately described by TGM?
I won't mind to share the footage within a small group, but definately not publishing it without premission from Jack.
Hybrid Mode
