[Yoda]

Originally Posted by Yoda

Originally Posted by jaminid Originally Posted by bobbywayne Is the low point in the diagram referring to the low point of the Swing (i.e., under the left shoulder) or the low point of the "Impact/Separation Interval"? Would it not seem to be the latter? Since the impact/separation interval represents only approximately 3/4" of clubhead travel, the diagram cannot be referring to the low point of the Swing. When viewed in that context, there is no "separation before low point"; i.e., the ball separates at the low point of the impact/separation interval. I'll need to look at the diagram to see if I can understand your explanation. I've always assumed, and still believe, that the diagram refers to the low point of the stroke. The diagram depicts the clubhead force vector as straight ahead versus the "outward" force of a pre-low point inpact. Also, all the diagrams showing the angle and arc of approaches reference the low point plane line, which is the low point of the stroke. I don't believe I recall a reference to the low point of the impact interval anywhere in the book. Even though I'm not sure I concur with your explanation, I appreciate you input. If I'm missing something, let me know. Thanks again. Per 7-10 (page 100, first paragraph): Normally, in the precision position per 2-G, the Left Wrist becomes Vertical to the ground at Low Point for all Hinge Actions. But, 'Vertical to the ground at Impact' gives a very desirable sameness for all Ball locations -- easily compensated by Clubface adjustment, without disturbing the prescribed Hand Motion. Both procedures are completely optional.

But, the left wrist "vertical at impact" procedure would still have the club moving downward, and outward, no? The 2-C-1 diagrams show neither at separation.

Any On Plane Impact -- either at or prior to Low Point -- must be Three Dimensional. The 2-C-1 diagrams stipulate Impact Geometry per 2-G and Clubhead Path Geometry per 2-N. Since these then are clearly Three Dimensional Impacts, please explain your comment: "The 2-C-1 diagrams show neither at separation."