|
Originally Posted by golf_sceptic
|
Thanks for that perspective neil. I think there is a strong chance you are right. Further, as ThinkingPlus pointed out there are so many benefits to using local frames of reference when discussing the golf swing that I have changed my mind and believe it was the right decision.
Ok. I don't understand the book 
As I said in an email to yoda just now, I came to the site to try to understand why so much of Mr Kelley's book read like gobbldegook. I now have a different perspective thanks to yoda and ThinkingPlus (indirectly). The book now makes a whole lot more sense in many ways.
I won't miss the feeble minded populism of some of the contributors here, but I thank one contributor who took the time to find a reference to Encyclopaedia Brittanica which supports my position.
BBFN
|
It (mine)was a sincere post and was not meant to be antagonistic,so I hope you didn't take it that way.The question was also genuine -and I assume your answer was somwhat tongue in cheek.Do you understand the book?